An In-Depth Look
at Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake
Margaret
Atwood writes of a future in which the world’s general population was wiped out
by a plague. She writes of a world in which the survival of any humans is
unknown—with the exception of one man: Snowman. Throughout Oryx and Crake,
Margaret Atwood uses repetition, dashes and metaphors to demonstrate the
devastating effects of isolation as well as the dangers of the world. The
repetition serves to create a sense of overwhelming isolation; a sense of
inescapable isolation. The dashes allow for glimpses into the previous
condition of the world and work as commentary on Snowman’s part in order to
emphasize his isolation, but also to introduce some of the dangers the world
holds. And the metaphors are incorporated to explain that each entity possess
good and evil, but because of the presence of evil, each aspect of life should
be approached with caution—as the world is dangerous.
Here, Atwood uses the
repetition of the word “alone” several times in close proximity to one another—as
he says, “Now I’m alone…all, all alone” in order to convey an overwhelming sense of
loneliness for the main character, Snowman (Atwood 10). This leads to the
conclusion that some disaster has occurred which, consequently, wiped out the
rest of the human population. The repetition is used to allow the idea to
really sink in that Snowman is truly alone as a human. This isolation becomes a
main theme throughout the rest of the novel in what is necessary to
survive—mentally and physically—in such an isolation.
The dashes which Atwood uses like “hear a human voice—a fully human
voice” are designed to qualify the preceding statement, but also serve as
insights into the world before the aftermath (Atwood 10). The implication here
is that there are some who are not completely human—again signifying the idea
of experimentation, which is a current cultural debate. Invented words and
species such as “pigoon” and “wolvog” also work to further the discussion about
genetic experiments (Atwood 10). The dashes can also represent his internal
thoughts, though they still include information about Snowman’s past.
By incorporating Snowman’s screaming by the sea, Atwood furthers the
idea of isolation and the toll it can take. As he has no one else to talk to,
he must talk to the land. As life is so full of misery and “dismay” he must
express his frustration by shouting (Atwood 10). And only by using foul
language is he able to make the situation feel any better—which speaks to the
emotional toll isolation takes on an individual.
The metaphors about the “beautiful demons” and the mermaids also shows
the emotions of Snowman when he is remembering his past (Atwood 11). The
memories, at first, seem pleasant and beautiful, but then they bring back the
misery of loss and end up swallowing him in sadness. The incorporation of this
metaphor also introduces the idea that each entity can possess good and evil
traits. That those people or creatures, even activities, which may at first,
illicit pleasure or a sense of good, may prove to be harmful and should be
avoided. This is a lesson Snowman is forced to learn in order to survive—and it
is one needed by every individual.
This passage demonstrates Atwood’s ability to turn simple words and
structures into more meaningful and profound ideas about the complexity of
humanity. The two ideas of isolation and worldly dangers work together to
further Atwood’s discussion of humanity, as in order to escape some of the
dangers, isolation is necessary, but isolation, itself, has both good and bad
sides. Through her use of repetition, dashes, and metaphors, Atwood explores
the complexity of man and how the dangers of the world and isolation from the
rest of humanity can have a devastating effect, though can mean the difference
between failure and survival.
An In-Depth Look
at Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale
Margaret
Atwood writes about a future dystopian society called the Republic of Gilead in
her novel The Handmaid’s Tale. In her book, she uses strategically
placed short sentences, detailed diction, and the use of internal thought in
order to examine the value of women in society as well as explore the hypocrisy
and complexity of authority. The short sentences allow for Atwood to clearly
express an important message and the diction often comes with a negative
connotation to reveal the unhappiness faced in society. The internal thought
explores the idea of rebellion on the inside versus conformity on the outside.
And each of these elements of Atwood’s writing build up the questions about
life, authority, and the purpose of women.
Atwood
is able to communicate her extremely complex ideas about society through the
use of short and simple phrases. Through her strategic placement of these
sentences, she is able to signify important themes of her novel—while
maintaining subtlety. When she incorporates the three short sentences, “It must
be just fine. It must be hell. It must be very silent.” she is able to portray
the themes that will later be explored in detail, in just a few short words
(Atwood 88). The concepts of Hell and silence play an important role in all of
the events which follow the introduction of Offred and her place in the
dystopian society: The Republic of Gilead. The significance of these themes is
indicated and furthered through Atwood’s use of the repetition in each of these
sentences. This creates a lasting impression as well as shows that, though
Offred is not permitted to speak, she is still able to think for herself.
That introduces another
concept: the value of women in society. This is discussed in great detail
through the use of internal thought—which also shows the internal rebellion
that is growing in Offred even as her exterior remains unchanged. Offred reflects
on the order of society and while she asks this question, her internal
questioning of society becomes evident. Atwood says, “To be a man, watched by
women” which shows both the significance of men, and the inferiority of women
(Atwood 87). While one man is watched by several women, and as he is watched at
all, the women are the ones who watch the men, and they “flinch” at any
movement of them (Atwood 87). This also demonstrates the idea of women’s fear
of men and oppression by authority—all in a few simple words by Atwood. And all
key concepts in her novel.
The
detailed diction also works to create a negative view of authority as well as
the hypocrisy and irony in life. The irony of the statement that the “Commander
sits, looking down”, which juxtaposes a man with a high rank and an act of
inferiority, furthers the questioning of authority, but is also furthered by
the negative diction which is used to describe different aspects of authority
throughout Atwood’s novel (Atwood 87). One strong instance of this diction is
when Atwood describes the reproductive organs of the authority in Offred’s home
as a “tentacle” (Atwood 88). As the connotations of the word “tentacle” bring
images of danger and oppression—as octopi use their tentacles to help suffocate
their prey—the negative portrayal of authority in Atwood’s novel becomes
inescapably clear (Atwood 88). This negative diction in regards to authority
continues throughout the book and bring into question the proper role of
authority in society.
Atwood
uses a variety of intelligent writing techniques in order to reveal the
messages within her writing and it is through her use of simple sentences,
fitting diction, and internal thoughts that she is able to bring into question
the purpose of authority and of life itself—in both Offred’s life as a woman in
the new world and on a more universal scale in the present.
In response to An In-Depth Look at Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake, by Margaret Atwood, I would first like to say that I agree with everything that you said, except that I think there is one more main literary device that adds great emphasis. I think that her use of the rhetorical question is wonderful. “Why had he found them so reassuring?” (Atwood 10) This gives the reader a look into what his life used to be from the beginning of the passage. The actual memories of the woman only emphasize. The quote also shows a portion of human nature. It shows that even though he is the survivor from the end of the human race, he still carries on the core principles of being human, which from you description of the book I assume is very important. I think you found many of the strong devices used in the book, I just think that the rhetorical question is also very important.
ReplyDeleteIn response to An In-Depth Look at Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale:
ReplyDeleteI thoroughly enjoyed, and agreed with, every point you made about the syntactical infrastructure of the passage you chose from The Handmaid’s Tale. I also enjoyed the point you made about Ms. Atwood’s weaving together of the use of internal thought and diction to convey the value of women in society—property and slaves—and how the women in the society felt about valued as such—negatively and seeing authority as hypocritical and ironic.
In your introductory paragraph, you mentioned the setting being in the Republic of Gilead. This immediately drew my attention as to what or where Gilead is or was. After looking up Gilead on Google, I truly believe that Margaret Atwood’s use of Gilead as the name of the Republic is extremely important and symbolic, though subtle. Gilead means “hill of testimony or mound of witness” or a “memorial site” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilead) in Hebrew. With this knowledge, it is clear why Ms. Atwood named this futuristic society the Republic of Gilead. With Gilead meaning a “mound of witnesses,” Atwood’s use of internal thought to convey what the witnesses of this atrocious model of society becomes much more significant; with Gilead also meaning a “memorial site,” the disillusion suffered by the handmaids of this society is made more apparent as well, as the government and authority is no longer committed to creating the best environment possible for all its people—the society has become a memorial to what once was. Using these two definitions, the title of society itself, The Republic of Gilead, conveys an extreme irony. A republic, by definition is “A state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives” (Google’s definition of republic). This society is the opposite of a republic—only a select few are on top, namely the men of society, while the rest are suppressed witnesses of this injustice and the society as a whole is only a shell, a memorial of what once was.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading your passage for The Handmaid’s Tale and your analysis, Atwood’s writing style is interesting due to the integrated fragmented sentences with the descriptive language. The short sentences provide this leeway to allow the reader to slow down the tempo, while keeping the main point emphasized. “It must be hell” demonstrates the ability to emphasize the stressful environment, yet it serves as a break from the description placed before and afterwards (Atwood 88). So along with your analysis of these two devices separately, Atwood seamless integration of the two devices together demonstrates a greater meaning.
ReplyDeleteI must, also, comment on the position of women in regards to the theme of The Handmaid’s Tale. The similarities between Hosseini, my author, and Atwood, are most prevalent in the thematic regard. Atwood demonstrates a rebellion of Offred, from a society which has kept her below any status, such as the patriarchal system built in Afghanistan does in Hosseini’s works. Though the settings are completely different, the rebellion made by Laila and Offred is similar, by not simply voicing against the injustice, but also resisting further mistreatment. Their ability to voice against the times and society, is what makes these characters special, and the authors similar.
In response to An In-Depth Look at Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake, by Margaret Atwood, I would first like to say that I agree with everything that you said, except for one difference. I think there is one more main literary device that adds great emphasis. I think that her use of the rhetorical question is wonderful. “Why had he found them so reassuring?” (Atwood 10) This gives the reader a look into what his life used to be from the beginning of the passage. The actual memories of the woman only emphasize the idea of his past life. The quote also shows a portion of human nature. It shows that even though he is the survivor from the end of the human race, he still carries on the core principles of being human, which from you description of the book I assume is very important. It also created the idea in my mind that maybe he will be the one to bring back the human race. A society cannot begin without personality, and if it is going to be a human society then the personality must also be from a human. I think you found many of the strong devices used in the book, I just think that the rhetorical question is also very important and should not be left out.
ReplyDeleteThrough your presentation, I couldn’t help but find interesting that Margaret Atwood would choose to write a novel in which she would portray all the work of women in the past one hundred or so years essentially useless. Although our world is nowhere close to being equal for all races and sexes, the United States has at least made some leeway against the battle of the sexes. That being said, and Margaret Atwood being a feminist, I came to wonder what exactly was her meaning of putting women back in their original status circa B.C. or present-day, like in places such as Saudi Arabia.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, after reading your blog posts and power point presentation, I was still not clear on the meaning of Atwood’s works. I know that your essay was not based completely on the position of females, but you say in your conclusion, “uses…writing techniques in order to reveal the messages…” This sort of confused me because I don’t understand the full meaning of her works. Although I have not read her novel, from what I read on your blog, is her meaning that women will never have the ability to be treated as equals? Or that oppression against the sexes has no future antidote? If others see this, feel free to comment; I’d be interested to hear your thoughts and if you could clear up my question that would be great
Margaret Atwood and what to do as well as the information provided. It's a lot and with impressive writing. friv 7
ReplyDelete